Modernisation of Little Hay Golf Course
Land Fill from Upper Bourne End Lane
Land Fill from Upper Bourne End Lane
- Turning
the golf course into a landfill site over 18 months with subsequent change of
views from the village, noise and dust.
- 840
HGV lorry movements in Upper Bourne End Lane over 5 ½ days per week which will
destroy Upper Bourne End Lane and make it totally unsafe for use for 18 months
- Causing considerable danger on the A41 bypass
If you are going to put
an objection in, it must be before July 5th
We are
seeking a meeting with the relevant parties to explain to the village what is
going on. In the meantime we ask you to
send letters of objection to Hertfordshire County Council, as indicated on the
Notification of Planning letter by 5th July.
So how did this story unfold?……………………….
You will have recently received a Notification of Planning
Application from Hertfordshire County Council.
You received it because you will be affected by it in one way or
another.
What is it all about?
If you had read the article in the Gazette (May 29th
‘Little Hay revamp set to make a real splash’) you may have felt excitement at
the prospect of both improving the course and the ecological impact of the
complex, all at no cost to the taxpayer.
When you received the Notification of Planning letter from Hertfordshire
about the project, seeing the term clean soils you may not have thought beyond
the day to day remodelling of a golf course.
So why the second part of the title?
You might however have noted that in the second letter, the
term ‘clean soils’ has been dropped.
Looking into the application itself you will find that ‘inert material’
is defined as to including construction waste.
But do read further. 295,000
cubic metres doesn’t mean much to most people, but it’s going to take 150 movements
of HGV lorries every working day for eighteen months to bring this construction
waste in. That’s one every 5 minutes ….
all going up the single track Upper Bourne End Lane! This sounds more like ‘land fill’!
So which story is true?
Actually, both! The project gets rid of waste by dumping it
on the hill behind us and covering it with a golf course. It’s all for free because of the money
received from the land fill.
So where does it leave us?
The Planning Group of BEVA has met to consider the proposals. We are pretty shocked by the shoddy way
Bourne End have been treated. (For
example the people of Box Lane were consulted on a proposal to use Upper Bourne
End as access, and guess what, they liked the idea. The people of Bourne End including Upper
Bourne End Lane were left out of this consultation.) But let’s not get confused. The application will be taken on its merits
not on how it was presented.
We believe there are two issues
The use of Upper Bourne End Lane as Access
We consider this to be totally unacceptable and surprised it
is even seen as workable.
· There is a perfectly adequate access already leading off Box Lane
· Although there are only a few residents in Upper Bourne End Lane, life will be intolerable for them.
· The lane is an important amenity for walkers, horse riders and cyclists.
· As there is no footpath there is a serious safety issue. (The focus here is on Bourne End residents, but the airfield is used for paintballing and other activities. Young people paintballing or from Bovingdon often use the lane to walk to McDonalds.)
· The lane will be irreparably damaged. It is hundreds of years old.
· We have used the argument of inadequate access as an important consideration in stopping development of the land adjacent to the golf course.
· We believe there is a safety issue for the A41, with lorries queuing on the slip road to get to Upper
Bourne End Lane. On their return, slow moving lorries entering up the hill will be meeting the fast moving traffic coming down the hill from the Berkhamsted direction.
The remodelling of the golf course
This is more difficult to give guidance on. It is hard to get to grips with what the area
will look like after the remodelling. There are many positive aspects such as
the planting of more native trees. We
are however unclear about the general impact on the lay of the land. It seems a
pity that we were not included in the offer to attend an open evening for
interested local residents, and so far we have had no success in getting
someone to talk to us.
What are we asking you to do?
In essence, take a view on the situation and express it.
We are clear that the use of Upper Bourne End Lane is unacceptable, and would urge you to write your objections. (We are advised that individual letters carry considerably more impact than any petition.)
We do not feel in a position to advise on the project as a whole. However, we would strongly urge you to look at the plans and voice your views.
For further details on how to access the plans see the Notification of Planning Application.
Comments
Post a Comment